Arthur Caplan author of the preface mentions that "it is only through an engagement with great ideas that we can find meaning and purpose in our lives.
To distinguish between fact and fiction in your search for knowledge, it is also invaluable to analyse yourself as a knower. Therefore, theories should not be eliminated solely based on their simplicity, as the simplest of explanations often yield to complexities as our knowledge of them increases.
What are its strengths? Here the term complexity is synonymous with accuracy, as the accuracy of knowledge is often determined by how intricate complex expressions are at describing an entity.
We look at its language, methodology and historical evolution.
Is there a scientific basis for beauty? According to the Principle, there is like a fundamental limit on the accuracy to the measurement of two independent variables — position and momentum in Quantum Physics. In fact, our intuitions about the natural world are often not very scientifc for example, children across the world intuitively feel that earth is flat.
To help students think about knowledge, the TOK guide has introduced the "knowledge frameworks". It draws on confirmation bias you count the hits and forget the misses.
So are we suitable objects for natural scientific study? Einstein is often quoted as an advocate of imagination, even though your maths or science teachers will not always encourage you to use more imagination within their lessons.
Reason, and particularly inductive reasoning, plays a major role within the scientific method. Scientific theories, however, may co-exist and be discarded at different points in time.
In TOK we look at the difference between natural sciences, human sciences and pseudo-science. I would argue that with the increased quick dissemination of information through current media, pseudo-science has somewhat gained in popularity.
Items not relevant to the particular purpose of the map are omitted. For example, when I had changed schools after my 10th grade, the sudden exposure to a more competitive environment along with an increased coursework, and other social factors made me anxious and incongruous.
Western civilisation went through a major cognitive paradigm shift around the 17th Century. Determining structure in language requires finding patterns in linguistic inputs and cognition involves finding patterns in dense, impenetrable information.
So in order for a psychologist to explain the change in my behavior, he would have to take into account all those factors into his model to come to his final decision.
A good example is how we can explain emotion through the two different areas of knowledge. No matter how intricate a piece of knowledge is, it is still an explanation of something that is compressed in terms that are understandable.
Pico Dyer for NYT: Interestingly, the TED talk below does acknowledge that incorrect theories have their value and that they sometimes may give rise to the creation of new theories and scientific discoveries.
Perception Our sensory organs and systems often seek out patterns in the data they receive. Psychology is one such subject where there is substantial difficulty in differentiating between accuracy and simplicity.TOK essay help!
"“In knowledge there is always a trade-off between accuracy and simplicity. “In knowledge there is always a trade-off between accuracy and simplicity.” Evaluate this statement in relation to two areas of knowledge.
In some senses this could become a discussion about. So knowledge intended to explain one aspect of the world, say, its physical nature, might look really quite different to knowledge that is designed to explain, for example, the way human beings interact." (p, TOK Guide, First Assessment ).
In conclusion, there is certainly a tradeoff between accuracy and simplicity as shown through the claims and counterclaims of the two areas of knowledge discussed in this essay. However, there are numerous cases, as shown, where simple statements need not be untrue, as well as accurate statements need not be complex in nature.
“In knowledge there is always a trade-off between accuracy and simplicity.” Evaluate this there is always a trade-off between accuracy and simplicity.”.
“In knowledge there is always a trade-off between accuracy and simplicity.” Evaluate this statement in relation to two areas of knowledge. The First Set of data The Second set of data Most of human knowledge has to do with noticing facts and regularities that could have been found out using existing knowledge.Download